Powder Indexing
A powder pattern is a list of angles and nothing else. Indexing is the step that turns it into a lattice: find the cell that puts a reflection at every one of those angles, and name the reflection at each. This page does it exhaustively for the three systems where it can be done exhaustively — cubic, one unknown, and tetragonal and hexagonal, two — so it either finds every cell that works or proves there is none.
- You supply
- A wavelength and a list of peak positions in degrees 2θ, one per line. No intensities and no widths: indexing uses positions alone. Three lines are the minimum the page will accept and eight or more is where the answer starts to be worth something — the panel on the floor says why.
- Reading it
- Finding a cell is not the same as being right, and in the two-parameter systems it is barely evidence at all: given eight random angles, a tetragonal cell accounting for every one of them turns up 385 times in 400. What separates a real lattice from an accidental fit is completeness — of the lines the cell predicts inside the range you measured, how many you actually saw. A real lattice comes out at 1.00 and the best accidental fit measured here reached 0.066. And every cell edge scales with the wavelength: index a Cu pattern as Mo and the whole cell is wrong by 2.168 with a perfect completeness.
Worked examples: quartz, twelve lines – one answer · α-iron, three lines – six cells, and no way to choose · NaCl – one lattice, two descriptions
See also: Bragg Calculator · HKL Calculator · Peak Finding · Line Broadening · Reduced Cell and Bravais Lattice · Space Group from Absences
Input
Results
No peaks were given. Each line of the box is one peak position, in degrees 2θ.
Where this comes from
- A simplified criterion for the reliability of a powder pattern indexing
P. M. de Wolff, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1968, 1, 108–113 · doi:10.1107/S002188986800508X
The paper that made this page’s central point first: a cell that accounts for every observed line is not thereby right, because a large enough cell accounts for anything. De Wolff’s M20 divides the fit by the number of lines the cell says should be there — the same quantity this page calls completeness, arrived at from the other side. - F_N: A criterion for rating powder diffraction patterns and evaluating the reliability of powder-pattern indexing
G. S. Smith and R. L. Snyder, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1979, 12, 60–65 · doi:10.1107/S002188987901178X
The other figure of merit in common use, and the one whose second factor is exactly Nobs/Nposs. Worth reading for why the residual alone is not enough: a wrong cell can fit every line to any precision you like if it is allowed enough reflections to choose from. - A fully automatic program for finding the unit cell from powder data
J. W. Visser, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1969, 2, 89–95 · doi:10.1107/S0021889869006649
ITO, the zone-search method, and the reason this page stops at three crystal systems: below monoclinic the search is a real program with a real convergence question, where cubic, tetragonal and hexagonal are one and two unknowns and can be enumerated exhaustively.